How the Prosecution of an Army Veteran Regarding the 1972 Londonderry Incident Concluded in Not Guilty Verdict

Protesters in a stand-off with army troops on Bloody Sunday
Protesters in a stand-off with army troops on Bloody Sunday

January 30th, 1972 is remembered as arguably the most deadly – and significant – days during multiple decades of unrest in Northern Ireland.

Throughout the area where it happened – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are painted on the buildings and etched in public consciousness.

A public gathering was held on a chilly yet clear period in Derry.

The protest was opposing the policy of imprisonment without charges – holding suspects without legal proceedings – which had been implemented following three years of violence.

Father Daly displayed a white cloth stained with blood as he tried to defend a assembly transporting a youth, the fatally wounded youth
Father Daly displayed a bloodied fabric as he tried to defend a assembly moving a youth, the fatally wounded youth

Military personnel from the elite army unit killed 13 people in the district – which was, and still is, a strongly Irish nationalist area.

A particular photograph became especially prominent.

Pictures showed a clergyman, Fr Edward Daly, displaying a bloodied white handkerchief in his effort to protect a group transporting a teenager, the fatally wounded individual, who had been fatally wounded.

Media personnel documented much footage on the day.

Historical records includes the priest explaining to a reporter that soldiers "gave the impression they would fire in all directions" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the discharge of weapons.

Civilians in the neighborhood being marched towards custody by British troops on Bloody Sunday
Civilians in the district being taken to arrest by military personnel on Bloody Sunday

The narrative of what happened was rejected by the original examination.

The first investigation found the soldiers had been shot at first.

During the negotiation period, Tony Blair's government set up another inquiry, after campaigning by surviving kin, who said Widgery had been a inadequate investigation.

That year, the findings by Lord Saville said that overall, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the individuals had presented danger.

At that time Prime Minister, the leader, issued an apology in the government chamber – saying killings were "improper and unacceptable."

Families of the deceased of the Bloody Sunday killings march from the district of the city to the Guildhall holding pictures of their loved ones
Families of the casualties of the 1972 incident killings march from the neighborhood of Londonderry to the Guildhall holding photographs of their loved ones

Law enforcement began to examine the incident.

A military veteran, known as the accused, was charged for homicide.

He was charged concerning the killings of James Wray, 22, and in his mid-twenties the second individual.

The accused was also accused of seeking to harm multiple individuals, other civilians, further individuals, Michael Quinn, and an unidentified individual.

There is a court ruling maintaining the defendant's identity protection, which his attorneys have argued is necessary because he is at risk of attack.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had only fired at individuals who were possessing firearms.

The statement was disputed in the concluding document.

Evidence from the examination could not be used straightforwardly as testimony in the criminal process.

During the trial, the defendant was hidden from public using a protective barrier.

He made statements for the first time in the proceedings at a proceeding in that month, to answer "innocent" when the accusations were presented.

Relatives and supporters of the deceased on the incident carry a placard and photographs of the victims
Family members and advocates of the deceased on the incident display a placard and images of those killed

Kin of the deceased on the incident travelled from Londonderry to the courthouse daily of the case.

One relative, whose brother Michael was died, said they understood that attending the case would be painful.

"I remember everything in my memory," John said, as we examined the primary sites referenced in the proceedings – from the location, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the nearby the area, where James Wray and another victim were fatally wounded.

"It reminds me to my location that day.

"I helped to carry the victim and put him in the vehicle.

"I went through every moment during the testimony.

"But even with enduring the process – it's still valuable for me."

One victim (left) and William McKinney (right) were among those who were killed on the incident
Lisa Stevens
Lisa Stevens

Blockchain enthusiast and financial analyst with a passion for demystifying crypto for everyday investors.